NOTE:- Advise available for all
countries laws vis-a-vis adultery & divorce so if you want
divorce from your adulterous wife & want to have Consultation with ATUR CHATUR by paying him the consultation fees then contact him
at +91-9873540498 & must also leave an email at ATURCHATUR@YAHOO.COM
HUMAN
RIGHTS OF NON RESIDENT INDIAN
NRI must know his human
rights so that he is NOT made to suffer by the corrupt cops & unethical
elements within Indian judiciary. Non Resident Indian who enforces his human
rights gets an edge over his litigations too because directly or indirectly he
is also telling the judiciary that these false cases are NOT at all triable due
to the evidences placed on record by him by way of written statement,
preliminary objections, RTI, CrPC 91, Perjury application, Contempt
application, criminal complaint against the wife, defamation or other counter
attacks by him NOT for wreaking vengeance but for proving his innocence.
HUMAN
RIGHTS VERSUS POLICE
Fair & Unbiased Investigation
is the human right available to a non resident Indian and if such NRI invokes
his human rights via his representations then the cops including the dirty cops
get a hint that this NRI knows his rights very well. But invoking your human
rights does NOT mean getting angry or writing the representations in a highly disrespectable
manner. Instead one needs to learn the art of writing skills because if the
writing skills of the like atur chatur are used then you also indirectly tell
the judge/ cops & opposite party advocate that your human rights make you
stand at almost equal standing/ equal footing with that of a woman in India.
Hence, if they think that women are weak, women are superior, women are heard
in priority in the courts then they will get another hint that you also stand
with equal footing meaning that you are equal to woman in India so if she does
wrong to you then she is also punishable u/s 211 r/w 506 IPC r/w 511 IPC but
for that non resident Indian needs to file an application party in person
before framing of issues stage i.e., before framing of charges stage
(hereinafter referred as FOC for the sake of brevity)
WHY PARTY IN PERSON?
NRI’s often ask me
questions as to how can I file an application party in person or why to file
such application party in person only & NOT through a lawyer or advocate
& what is the harm in filing such application through a counsel or how can
I legally represent before the court without a vakeel or vakalatnama.
The answer is that,
PARTY IN PERSON IS VERY POWERFUL & no application of yours can be withdrawn
without your written consent but if you have given a vakalatnama then such
counsel is in a position to represent you the way he likes so if you are
getting suggestions from Hon’ble Atur Chatur then filing applications party in
person will derive maximum oputput.
What is the problem with
withdrawing of an application?
Because, if an
application is withdrawn then the NRI loses the right to raise those grounds
again within his entire litigation hence party in person means that you have
NOT signed anything like a power of attorney to someone & if the opposite
party even bribes the hon’ble judge then also they won’t be able to get
anything favorable for them unless you yourself withdraw that application in
writing.
Is there possibility of
some other unethical practices against the NRI by the opposite party by bribing
heavily the court?
YES, if the opposite
party is strong financially & they have links & approaches with the
judge & they come in a position to influence the judge/ MM then your
applications can be withdrawn without openly discussing that in the court &
by writing that within the court’s order sheet. And thereafter, you can be
prevented from reading that unethical order by NOT uploading in the website for
different reasons or by NOT allowing you to reach towards certified copy of the
order by bribing court officials or other unethical practices.
What can I do if I get
access to such court’s order?
You can do different
things at different points of time.
For Example:-
(a) If
wrong is said & done to you in open court then same day you can file with
the same judge/ MM an application with the heading, “WRITTEN NOTES OF
ARGUMENTS” which is also known as “PURSHISH APPLICATION”. A judge/ MM is duty
bound to include those facts within his order sheet.
(b) You
can challenge such order openly ordered & announced in open court which is
wrong when compared with your oral or written statement.
(c) You
can complaint against a judge for mental torture or defamation or a simple fact
based complaint.
(d) You
can appeal in sessions or next higher level within judiciary.
(e) You
can file RECALL APPLICATION before that family court JFC/ PJ or before that
mahila court MM.
(f) You
can file revision before District Judge.
(g) You
can file REVIEW APPLICATION before district judge.
(h) You
can complaint directly in HIGH Court via Writ/ Complaint etc
(i) You
can file Contempt of Court application against a court if the court itself in
in contempt of High Court or Supreme Court orders.
HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION of NRI
A non resident Indian can be
subjected to human rights violation & hence a NRI must remember his
following human rights viz.,
2.0 That right to fair trial in judicial proceedings whether
civil or criminal is a human right explained in below paras.
2.1 That fair trial includes pre-trial stage in the judicial
proceedings as this stage determines whether the matter is triable or not or
whether there is any abuse of court or not. Interestingly, my applications
already on record mentions non-triability, perjury, unethical practices, fraud
on court & lot more facts & circumstances which will prove that this is
not just my human rights violation but this is also a classic real-life example
of scandalization within family courts @ XYZ Courts vis-à-vis Delhi District
Courts (or the name of the state concerned).
2.2 That if the court case is proceeded without following the
principles of good faith then it is the violation of my human rights.
2.3 That when the matter is not even triable as per my three
applications filed by me alongwith WS itself & if the matter is put to
trial without deciding my applications then this is against the principles of
good faith hence my human rights violation.
2.4 That if unethical practices vis-a-vis court record tampering
has taken place within the above HMA to suppress my three applications filed by
me alongwith WS itself then this is fraud on court & this is also my human
rights violation.
2.5 That this protection against getting a trial is fully
consistent with human rights law because human rights law prohibits putting
people on trial when there is no crime to try them for. Hence putting the above
noted “DIVORCE” on ex-parte evidence on very first instance by Hon’ble Principal
Judge concerned without even perusing the respondent’s submissions viz., Written
Statement, applications, counter objections, perjury, fraud on court, unethical
practices or even predecessor judge’s order sheets violates the human rights
& thereby the Hon’ble Principal Judge started gifting illegal favors to the
petitioner/ wife for the reasons best known to him only & this is wrong not
just morally, but this wrong also socially, technically, legally (Lego-Technical
Fallacy) & also my human rights violation and hence I vehemently raise my
written objection in this regard & seek enquiry & investigation by the
Hon’ble High Court to understand & disclose the true reasons & true
motive behind such illegal favors which have resulted also in my human rights
violation hereinafter referred as HRV for brevity.
2.6 That the right to equality before the law is sometimes
regarded as part of the right to a fair trial. The right entitles individuals
to be recognized as subject, not as object, of the law. International human
rights law permits no derogation or exceptions to this human right.
2.7 That it is a settled proposition that, "Everyone is
entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and
impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of
any criminal charge against him.” And those acts (explained above & within
this entire complaint) by the Hon’ble Principal Judge proofs his dependent
& partial attitude which on one hand is non est in the eyes of law & on
the other hand attracts provisions of Lego-technical fallacy hence all such
acts are also void in the eyes of law.
2.8 That the aim of this right is to ensure the proper
administration of justice. As a minimum the right to fair trial includes the
following fair trial rights in civil and criminal proceedings:
the right to be heard by a competent, independent and impartial
tribunal
the right to a public hearing
the right to be heard within a reasonable time
the right to counsel
the right to interpretation
2.9 That "All persons shall be equal before the courts and
tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his
rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair
and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal
established by law."
2.10 That in this regard it can be seen that the Hon’ble Principal
Judge has offered illegal favors to the petitioner/ wife which is not just
against the principles of good faith & human rights but such an act is also
termed as unbecoming of a judicial officer (read with explanations in entire
complaint not being repeated for brevity.)
2.11 That the European Court of Human Rights and the
Inter-American Court of Human Rights have clarified that the right to a fair
trial applies to all types of judicial proceedings, whether civil and criminal.
According to the European Court of Human Rights, Article 6 of the European
Convention on Human Rights and the fair trial rights apply to all civil rights
and obligations created under domestic law and therefore to all civil
proceedings.
2.12 That as per the definition, Human rights are norms that
help to protect all people everywhere from severe political, legal, and social
abuses. Examples of human rights are the right to freedom of religion, the
right to a fair trial when charged with a crime, the right not to be tortured,
and the right to engage in political activity.
2.13 That Human rights have high-priority. Maurice Cranston held
that human rights are matters of “paramount importance” and their violation “a
grave affront to justice” (Cranston 1967). If human rights did not have high
priority they would not have the ability to compete with other powerful
considerations such as national stability and security, individual and national
self-determination, and national and global prosperity.
2.14 That as per Article 1 of the United Nations Universal
Declaration of Human Rights (hereinafter UNUDHR for brevity) "All human
beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights." And in India in
April 2014 (sometime around 15th April’2014) LGBT Community was recognized as a
third gender in India & as per Supreme Court of India it is mandatory to
include LGBT within the forms & also some authorities have been ordered to
make separate toilets for LGBT so if after passage of LGBT if any judicial
officer defies all lego-technicalities in the very first hearing before him and
offers illegal favors to one of the genders then this is a serious issue
besides being my HRV.
2.15 That as per Article 7 of UNUDHR "All are equal before
the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the
law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in
violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such
discrimination.” And this law was made even before LGBT were recognized in
India and now since for the past two years approx one more gender has been
recognized in India & despite being three broad genders categorized in
India if a senior rank judicial officer does any gender discrimination or
offers illegal favors to one of the genders in a civil suit/ petition vis-à-vis
matrimonial dispute in a family matter
(read with entire complaint especially those paras related to Hon’ble Principal
Judge) then this attracts penalties under human rights violation too both at
the national level & at the international level. I vehemently raise my
voice vis-à-vis my written objection to this violation of my Human rights in
the hands of Principal Judge.
2.16 That as per Article 8 of UNUDHR "Everyone has the
right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts
violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by
law."
2.17 That as per Article 12 of UNUDHR "No one shall be
subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or
correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the
right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks."
2.18 That Some human rights are said to be "inalienable
rights". The term inalienable rights (or unalienable rights) refers to
"a set of human rights that are fundamental, are not awarded by human
power, and cannot be surrendered."
2.19 That Human rights violations
occur when actions by state (or non-state) actors abuse, ignore, or deny basic
human rights (including civil, political, cultural, social, and economic
rights).
NRI 498a Helpline are the
rights which a NRI male victim of false cases by NRI wife or by Indian wife can
exercise including the human rights.
SETTLEMENT OF NRI MATTER
(a) Many
NON RESIDENT INDIANS after years of litigations think about the settlement &
some even think about this right from the beginning but the settlement expert
suggests to all NRI’s that one needs to file counter cases if the cases have
been moved to the court, ONLY THEN the opposite gang will come on the
settlement table or negotiation table.
HOW TO MAKE WIFE AGREE FOR
SETTLEMENT
Tax Evasion Petition,
Complaint against government servant Father in law & other counter cases
& valid RTI’s can be filed against the wife & in-laws so that the wife
of NRI husband comes for settlent. Atur Chatur Sir can be contacted for more
methods on how to bring the wife agree for settlement of these false cases on
non resident Indian husband & his entire family. So fight strong & get
out of these false cases soon with the help of Atur Chatur Sir.
Best Wishes & Happy Fighting false
cases & SOCIAL STIGMA on you & family!!!.